🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.